Support ForumCanonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs – Support Forum https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/feed/ Mon, 13 May 2024 03:31:39 +0200 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.12-6148 en-US https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4442 <![CDATA[Canonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs]]> https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4442 Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:05:30 +0000 WAPPUK would i need to add a rel canonical redirect to these types of urls if i am using tabs etc…

https://www. wearepromotionalproducts.co.uk/#tab3

]]>
https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4448 <![CDATA[Reply To: Canonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs]]> https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4448 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:08:46 +0000 IshYoBoy Hey,

Not sure if we understand what you mean by canonical redirect for this example. But since this is a link to a fragment of the given page I guess it is not necessary. Maybe try reading more about the topic.

E.g.:
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/52401/how-does-google-treat-hash-fragment-inside-a-canonical-url

Cheers

A 5 star rating is always a great motivation for us if you are happy with our theme or support!
Themeforest | MojoMarketplace | Creative Market

]]>
https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4459 <![CDATA[Reply To: Canonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs]]> https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4459 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:27:19 +0000 WAPPUK Hi,

So does google not crawl the content I have in the toggles and accordions

“Traditionally, hash fragments (that is, everything after # in the URL) have been used to indicate one portion of a static HTML document. …hash fragments are not part of HTTP requests (and as a result they are not sent to the server)

Consequently as this covers, the Googlebot ignores hash fragments by default. Therefore for this URL:

https://example.com/article/1543#how-to-boost-seo

Googlebot should just look at the resource returned by the server: https://example.com/article/1543 while ignoring the hash fragment: how-to-boost-seo.

So essentially the resource for the above URL is the canonical URL after normalization (i.e., removing the fragment).

The purpose of using a slug is to identify a page as a human-readable keyword. Using a fragment confuses this purpose and obscures its readability:

/how-to-boost-seo is a lot more readable than: /1543#how-to-boost-seo

So in short, using a fragment as a slug would not seem beneficial to users or search engines.”

]]>
https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4460 <![CDATA[Reply To: Canonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs]]> https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4460 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:38:40 +0000 WAPPUK Sorry my bad! There was a java script error on the page which was causing the URL to change to #….

It doesn’t anymore!

Thanks

]]>
https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4468 <![CDATA[Reply To: Canonical urls, rel cannonical with tabs]]> https://support.ishyoboy.com/forums/topic/canonical-urls-rel-cannonical-with-tabs/#post-4468 Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:40:15 +0000 IshYoBoy - Peter You are welcome.

Glad you were able to fix it.

Bye

---
If you are happy with our theme and support please rate us in your Downloads Section on ThemeForest. A 5 star rating is always a great motivation for us!

]]>